The reason why We Don’t Deal With Weak Performance in the Workplace
One of the most repeated challenges I hear about derives from leaders having a hassle managing a poor performer. More often than not, we know that the staff member is not delivering against our expectations, and we may have possibly had a conversation using them to try to get to the bottom of the computer. But that’s where the idea stopped and has stayed for the weeks, months, and sometimes, regretfully, years.
So why hasn’t the idea been dealt with yet?
The most prevalent reason for not dealing with its… wait for it… fear! I know that surprised a few of anyone because you never really thought of yourself on your own as a fearful kind of man or woman. But the truth is we’ve probably not addressed it because we by no means felt that comfortable with managing it.
The good news is that with a few top-rated tips, most problems might be resolved within a short amount of time.
And so, let’s start with the fear point. Why don’t we want to deal with this?
The primary reason for not facing a performance problem is anxiety about the consequences. These usually get one of two forms.
The first worry is fear of the employee:
“How dare you!? What do a person mean I’m not performing my job? I’ve provided my best years for this company and this is the way you repay me! ”
All of us don’t want this. We would rather sit it. But, maybe the performance can get better soon. They’re simply having a difficult time at the moment. So, a possibility worth confronting now is that they will leave soon enough. Or, perhaps I’ll wait until they’re in a better mood.
That’s a large amount of ‘maybes.’ And maybe your company will continue to pay the cost for this person not providing what you expected once they moved into the role.
The reality is that by not facing the performance issue, a person (yes, you) is not genuinely doing your job, costing your organization in lost productivity, impacting on employee comfort, and, this one may amaze you as well, not aiding an employee that could make use of some of your guidance.
Being a manager of employees, you aren’t doing the job that is likely if you don’t tackle these troubles. This is what management is rapid ‘managing.’ So let’s seize the bull by the ball and manage this one.
Any time one of your employees will not pull their weight, who has picked up the slack? Effectively, you do, along with the rest of the staff. This inevitably leads to some decline in morale along with (it gets worse) the opportunity of other employees coming down using stress-related illnesses and very prevalent absenteeism coming into the workplace—May vicious circle. By not necessarily dealing with one case, you could learn yourself with the problem growing.
And, what about the person while using performance problems? The reality is that when they are underperforming, they possibly don’t care and therefore possess little desire to change, or even they’re stuck in a volatile manner of lack of recognition resulting in lack of job satisfaction resulting in lack of self-confidence leading to poor performance leading to lack of work recognition leading to… and so on. Most poor-performing employees get into the second category, and it’s worth finding out what your worker cares about because if they want to change, you can make a difference.
The second fear all frontrunners face when dealing with overall performance matters is fear of regulations.
You know the one. Jo’s brother’s friend’s partner took their employer to a tribunal about daring to utter the ‘P’ word (performance! ) within a hundred miles of Jo’s brother’s friend’s partner. Plus, they won—hundreds of thousands.
If it’s not the case, we have all heard similar horror stories. So we have something to worry about.
Or do we?
Employment counsel plays a very important role in protecting employees against corrupt, unthinking, and uncaring recruiters. If you fit into one of these classes, you needn’t read any additional. But if you don’t, chances are you are in a good position to ensure you have little to worry about.
Since, providing you put some thought as part of your performance management process, as long as you demonstrate that you do care. Hence, if you apply fair principles towards your management decisions, you come in a strong position to prevent this sort of tribunal even being contemplated, let alone being raised versus you and your organization.
Our UK legislation requires that employees have certain protection under the law when their employment is usually put at risk. That means if there is a chance that the member of staff could lose their task, then you, as the employer, have to make sure that the right rules are generally followed to demonstrate that you had been fair and gave your employee the appropriate opportunities, with the performance management process, to enhance.
If these rules tend to be followed and, much more significantly, if you do so with the genuine intention of improving the overall performance problem, then there is a small chance of facing an employment conseil.
What happens if you do get it wrong?
The maximum award for compensation for any case relating to Unfair Termination (as would be the case along with performance management gone awry) is currently, in July 2011, 80 400 (68 000 compensatory awards plus twelve 000 basic awards). The scary figure, no doubt. However, the average award, taken from the latest data in 2010, displays a figure of nine, 120. Even better, the average award (i. e., half of the population below as well as above this point – an ingenious way of ironing out several very high payments and putting together a more balanced picture) had been 4 903.
What happens if you occur to decide not to deal with it? (Because you are choosing)
What is the price of not tackling the issue? First, increase the plummeting morale, typically the lost productivity from all of your current employees, the stress and absenteeism issues, and the additional recruitment charges of an organization with high attrition. You’ll soon find that your costs add up to a level that often far exceeds the potential burning you might incur if you come up with a complete hash of the course of action.